![]() ![]() However, the Snapdragon 820 and the Exynos 8890 are still faster than Kirin 960 in terms of random write speeds. Since the Kirin 960 uses faster UFS 2.1 storage controller, sequential read/write and random read speeds are better than all of its competing chipsets. Huawei’s slideshows also showed how Kirin 960’s single-core and multi-core memory latency is better than that of its competitors. Moreover, the company also claimed that ARM’s new Mali-G71MP8 GPU, which is used in the Kirin 960, is slightly more powerful than Adreno 530 and Mali-T880MP12 GPU from the Snapdragon 820 and Exynos 8890. Only Apple’s A10 Fusion was able to score more than Kirin 960 in the Geekbench 4 single-core test. However, the company showcased that its chipset scored higher than all its Android counterparts in Geekbench 4 benchmark’s single-core and multi-core tests. The Kirin 960 still uses ARM’s stock CPU cores compared to Qualcomm’s Kryo and Samsung’s Exynos M1 custom CPU cores. Samsung Exynos 8890 Huawei HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs. The Mali-G71 GPU uses ARM’s latest Bifrost architecture, and offers better performance than its previous high-end GPU, the Mali-T880. However, the company has used the latest Mali-G71 GPU (with eight cores) inside its Kirin 960 chipset. ![]() Huawei chipsets have always been slightly weaker in terms of graphical performance due to the company deciding to embed relatively weaker GPUs. H.264 video encoding for 4K videos is possible as well. The processor can be used with faster UFS 2.1 storage chips and it can encode and decode HEVC videos at 4K (2160p) resolution. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |